Back to search
2502.00918

Equilibrium Moment Analysis of Itô SDEs

David Sabin-Miller, Daniel M. Abrams

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives the Euler–Maruyama (EM) fixed-point identity for the second moment at equilibrium (its Eq. (5)) and, for the cubic example F(x) = −x^3 − 3σ^2 x and G(x)^2 = 15σ^6 + 36σ^4 x^2 + 9σ^2 x^4, obtains the leading-order relation (its Eq. (7)) and the exact Δt-level relation (its Eq. (8)). It then concludes that for σ > √2/3 the right-hand side is strictly positive, contradicting the equilibrium identity and forcing the second moment to diverge. The candidate solution reproduces exactly this chain: the same EM moment identity, the same coefficients for μ2, μ4, μ6, and the same contradiction argument for σ > √2/3. The small caveat noted in the paper—that deriving Eq. (5) implicitly assumes μ2 is finite and swaps integrals—is also acknowledged. Overall, the reasoning and formulas match the paper’s results and logic closely. See the paper’s presentation of the EM kernel and equilibrium map, the second-moment identity (Eq. (5)), and its specialization to this F, G producing Eqs. (7) and (8) and the σ-threshold conclusion.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The work cleanly derives EM-based equilibrium moment identities and leverages them to identify a noise threshold beyond which equilibrium moments must diverge in a nontrivial example. The computations are correct and the reasoning is clear. Minor clarifications about the status of EM vs. SDE equilibria and the role of moment-finiteness would enhance rigor but do not alter the main conclusions.