2502.08644
Rhythmic sharing: A bio-inspired paradigm for zero-shot adaptive learning in neural networks
Hoony Kang, Wolfgang Losert
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper reduces ϕ̇ = ω0 + ε sin(Ψ0 − ϕ) to θ̇ = ω0 − ε sin θ by a constant shift and, via the tangent half‑angle substitution, presents the closed-form solution ϕ(t) = 2 tan⁻¹[ ε/ω0 + (Δ/ω0) tan((Δ/2) t + ξ0 ) ] with Δ = √(ω0² − ε²). It then argues that for |ω0| < |ε|, Δ is imaginary and the tan becomes tanh, yielding convergence (oscillation death), whereas for |ω0| > |ε|, one gets a genuine tan and no limit exists . The candidate solution follows the same method, gives a unified formula (also keeping the Ψ0 shift explicit), computes the limiting equilibrium, and provides an independent monotonicity argument for the nonconvergent regime. Minor issues: the paper’s definition of ξ0 contains an extraneous factor of 2, and both paper and model omit the boundary case |ω0| = |ε| (which also converges).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The subsection on oscillation death for isolated links uses a standard but correct calculation to support a central modeling claim. The derivation and qualitative conclusions are right, but a small algebraic typo in ξ0 and the omission of the boundary case |ω0| = |ε| should be addressed. Clarifying the role of the constant phase shift and phase unwrapping would further strengthen clarity.