2502.08693
Equilibrium Stability for Open Zooming Systems
Rafael A. Bilbao, Eduardo Santana
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper states and proves Theorem A: FZ = {(f, φ) : f is zooming and φ has locally Hölder induced potential} is equilibrium stable, using a direct variational approach. The proof extracts an invariant weak-* limit, uses a generating partition for the limiting equilibrium (Lemma 3.0.1), upper semicontinuity of entropy (via Brin–Katok/local entropy and generating partitions), and a semicontinuity bound Pf(φ) ≤ lim sup P_{fn}(φn) to conclude that every weak-* limit μ0 is an equilibrium state for (f, φ) . In contrast, the model’s argument assumes one can choose, for all large n, a common inducing scheme with uniform expansion/distortion and a common coding that yields a uniform Lasota–Yorke inequality and spectral gap, then applies tower-level spectral stability and projects back. Those uniformity and common-coding assumptions are not guaranteed by the definition of FZ and are not used (nor needed) in the paper’s proof. Hence, the model solution relies on unproven hypotheses in this generality, while the paper’s argument is correct under the stated setting .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes equilibrium stability for open zooming systems and zooming potentials with locally Hölder induced potentials using a concise variational argument that avoids stronger uniform tower assumptions. The result is a useful consolidation in the nonuniformly expanding/open setting. Some technical steps are summarized and could benefit from minor clarifications (generating partition for the limit and an explicit continuity remark for pressure in the potential), but the overall contribution is sound and clearly presented.