2502.10969
MOSER’S TWIST THEOREM REVISITED
Yi Liu, Lin Wang
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 proves that for Gn(x,x′)=½(x−x′)^2+q_n^{-(4+ε)}V(q_nx′), the exact twist map fn admits, for each constant‑type α and all large n, an invariant circle with rotation number α that is a C^{2+ε′} graph (any ε′<ε) . The candidate solution derives the same result by showing fn→f̄ in C^{3+ε′} and invoking Herman’s finite‑smoothness KAM theorem for constant‑type α; this aligns with the paper’s observation that ‖fn−f̄‖_{C^{3+ε′}}→0 as n→∞ and that the circle is a graph . The proofs, however, differ: the paper uses a Katznelson–Ornstein/Mather–type variational approach, not KAM .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper delivers a streamlined, variational-style proof of a classical persistence result for twist maps at nearly optimal regularity. While the theorem is known, the argument’s structure and quantitative induction may interest specialists and improve accessibility beyond fully KAM-based proofs. Minor edits clarifying notation, constants, and an explicit near-integrable estimate would enhance clarity and usefulness.