2502.14564
Thermal phototactic bioconvection in an isotropic porous medium heated from above
S. K. Rajput, M. K. Panda, A. Rathi
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s linearized model includes Beer–Lambert shading feedback, producing nonlocal terms (ℵ1∫Θ, k^2ℵ2Θ, ℵ0) and boundary couplings (via Φ) in the cell equation and boundary conditions; all are retained in Eqs. (43)–(52) and (46)–(57). The candidate solution drops these terms and replaces the cell dynamics by a local drift–diffusion operator, then asserts energy identities (E3–E6) and accretivity that do not hold for the paper’s operator. As a result, the candidate’s “exact” monotonicity proofs (in RT and Le, for every k) do not apply to the paper’s model. Nevertheless, the paper’s numerical findings—RT stabilizes (Rc_B increases) and Le destabilizes (Rc_B decreases), and oscillations are most pronounced when the sublayer sits around z≈3/4 and are suppressed as RT grows—are consistent and explicitly documented in the results and conclusion.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The scientific model and numerical study are coherent and align with established physical intuition. Linearization and boundary conditions are carefully laid out, and the results convincingly demonstrate stabilization by heating from above and destabilization with increasing Lewis number. The conclusions about oscillatory onsets are reasonable and supported. A handful of typographical inconsistencies (e.g., wording about heating location; a caption sentence conflating thermal and Lewis-number variation) and a missing explicit definition of one linearized coefficient should be addressed for clarity.