2502.18337
BOUNDING THE LOCAL DIMENSION OF THE CONVOLUTION OF MEASURES
Kevin G. Hare, Joaquin G. Prandi
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s proof of Theorem 1.1 is correct and self-contained: it constructs a positive-measure subset A_ε of Nz with uniform control on μ(B(·,r)) at all sufficiently small r, then lower-bounds (μ*ν)(B(z,r)) and derives the desired upper local-dimension bound at z . By contrast, the model’s proof attempts to interchange limsup and sup over x (claiming limsup_{r→0} sup_{x∈E} a(x,r) ≤ sup_{x∈E} limsup_{r→0} a(x,r)), which is generally false without uniformity; the correct minimax inequality goes in the opposite direction. This invalid step is exactly what the paper avoids via the A_ε,n construction and Lemma 1.4 .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper establishes a clean and correct upper bound on the local dimension of convolutions in a general metric-group setting. The proof method—via a uniform subset A\_ε and a simple measure-theoretic lemma—is technically light yet effective and connects to several applications on the line and torus. Exposition is solid; a few minor clarifications would improve readability. Overall, a useful and reliable contribution for specialists.