2502.19923
On Piecewise Affine Reachability with Bellman Operators
Anton Varonka, Kazuki Watanabe
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves BOR decidable (i) for all dimensions when t ≠ μΦ via an explicit finite bound derived from interval iteration, and (ii) when t = μΦ with s comparable to μΦ by showing eventual tightness of actions and a finite-state sign abstraction; in d=2 it further gives a complete decision procedure for the remaining incomparable case (Theorem 29). These claims are supported by Proposition 9, Lemma 16 and Corollary 17, Propositions 13–14 (combined as Theorem 19), and the d=2 analysis built via a matrix-semigroup rephrasing and the F-operator, culminating in Lemma 28 and Theorem 29 . By contrast, the model’s solution contains a critical flaw in the “s ≥ μΦ” comparable case: it assumes a symmetric closure argument that incorrectly treats leaking actions as always below μΦ, contradicting the paper’s Example 15 and subsequent analysis ; and its 2D algorithm lacks a proved loop-elimination bound, leaving termination unestablished.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} A solid and timely contribution: the paper settles BOR decidability in all dimensions for t ≠ μΦ and for comparable s when t = μΦ, and completes the d = 2 picture via a tailored matrix-semigroup analysis. The proofs are technically sound and align with standard properties of Bellman operators and value iteration. Minor presentation enhancements (more intuition, examples, and pseudocode) would improve accessibility.