Back to search
2503.00236

LARGE-TIME ASYMPTOTICS FOR HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS WITH NON-SYMMETRIC RELAXATION: AN ALGORITHMIC APPROACH

Timothée Crin-Barat, Lorenzo Liverani, Ling-Yun Shou, Enrique Zuazua

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves Theorem 2.4 via hypocoercive Lyapunov functionals built from Bs(iξA+Ba)^k, obtaining frequency-differential inequalities that, together with the two-frequency bounds defining α and β (Lemma 2.2), yield exactly the stated high/low-frequency L2 decay rates (polynomial with loss governed by α at high frequencies; heat-like t^{-1/(4β)} at low frequencies), including exponential decay when α=0 or β=0. The candidate solution constructs an equivalent frequency-dependent hypocoercive energy E(ξ,t)=⟨P(ξ)Û,Û⟩ with cross-terms between S T^k and S T^{k+1}, derives dE/dt + c Σ w_k(ξ)|S T^kÛ|^2 ≤ 0, invokes the same two-frequency inequalities, and integrates in ξ to reach the same rates. This aligns with the paper’s pointwise-in-ξ version (Remark 3.4) and the dyadic proof in Section 3, differing mainly in presentation (matrix multiplier vs. scalar perturbed energies). No logical gap or contradiction was found. See the paper’s statements of Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 2.4 and the companion Lyapunov constructions for high/low frequencies .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops a robust inhomogeneous hypocoercivity framework for linear hyperbolic systems with non-symmetric relaxation, proving general decay rates under a Kalman-type condition and then refining the construction to capture sharper behavior. The methodology is sound and well-motivated; technical estimates are aligned with established hypocoercivity techniques. Clarifying the intuition behind the key lemma and providing more worked examples would further enhance readability and impact.