Back to search
2503.07528

Real-Time Structural Deflection Estimation in Hydraulically Actuated Systems Using 3D Flexible Multibody Simulation and DNNs

Qasim Khadim, Peter Manzl, Emil Kurvinen, Aki Mikkola, Grzegorz Orzechowski, Johannes Gerstmayr

incompletemedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper clearly states and demonstrates the two central claims on a hydraulically actuated flexible boom: (A) single-step estimation achieves test MAPE below 1.5% in multiple sensor configurations, including a two-sensor case, and (B) batch speed-up S≈10^7 over the flexible multibody simulation, with S defined as S = (tsim / tNN)·(nout / nin). These are documented via figures and text, and the paper also specifies a statistics-only procedure to compute td without equations of motion, along with the S formula used for timing comparisons. However, for replication and auditing, important experimental specifics (e.g., explicit numeric values of nin, nout, tsim, tNN per batch; the exact architecture sizes; and a clearly separated test split) are not fully enumerated in the text beyond figures and general descriptions, making the empirical validation incomplete from a strict reproducibility standpoint (e.g., the reported S uses a figure and definition but without a full tabulated breakdown; the model description gives layer patterns like ‘L’, ‘TLSLTLSLT’ but omits widths). On the candidate side, the solution provides a precise estimator class, a statistics-only method to compute td, and a rigorous training/evaluation and timing protocol that mirrors the paper’s definitions, including the same S formula and a two-sensor option; yet it deliberately does not execute experiments or report results and thus cannot verify A or B here. Therefore, the paper’s experimental proof is under-specified for independent reproduction, and the model solution is a well-defined plan that stops short of verification—both incomplete. Key supporting passages: the paper’s MAPE results and two-sensor feasibility are described in the evaluation section and summary (maximum MAPE below 1.5%; two sensors U and s suffice) , the S formula and speed-up result are given with timing considerations (GPU init 0.2 ms, S definition, factor 10^7) , and the statistics-only td computation is specified (δy-threshold method, n* persistence, averaging td over samples) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

Promising, relevant contribution applying SLIDE to hydraulically actuated flexible systems with a practical, equation-free td computation and strong reported empirical results. To meet reproducibility standards and to allow independent auditing of the claimed 1.5\% MAPE and 10\^7 speed-up, the paper should add complete architectural specifications, a clear train/val/test protocol, and a detailed timing breakdown (with uncertainty). With these clarifications, the work would make a solid applied impact.