Back to search
2503.11171

The stochastic Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation on Jacobi structures

Pingyuan Wei, Qiao Huang, Jinqiao Duan

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 4.1 (stochastic contact HJ formalism) establishes the equivalence between (i) the lifted Hamiltonian semimartingale condition and (ii) a pair of stochastic contact HJB equations, and it reduces them to the single scalar Stratonovich identity ∂tS dt + h(j1S) · δXt = 0. The candidate solution proves the same equivalence by a chain-rule computation combined with a pointwise decomposition along im j1S into horizontal, vertical, and Reeb components. This mirrors the paper’s argument, which uses the same chain rule, the vertical-lift operator, and Lemma 4.5 to pass from the integral identity to the HJB equations. The only substantive issue in the candidate solution is a sign slip in the preliminary identity ιΛ♯(α) dη = −(α − α(R)η), which conflicts with the paper’s contact identities and leads to a sign-flipped coordinate expression for Vh; however, the subsequent key decomposition (⋆) and the resulting HJB system and scalar identity match the paper’s result. Hence both are correct; the proofs are substantially the same up to minor sign conventions and presentation differences. See Theorem 4.1 and its proof, Lemma 4.5, and the contact vector-field formulas (Proposition 4.18/Example 4.19) in the paper .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper develops a coherent stochastic HJ framework on Jacobi manifolds, with careful integration of contact geometry. The main equivalence (Theorem 4.1) is correct and well-motivated. The presentation could benefit from brief clarifications of sign conventions in the contact setting and explicit pointers to the key technical lemma used in the HJ proof. Overall, the contribution is solid and timely.