2503.11264
On the emergence and properties of weird quasiperiodic attractors
Laura Gardini, Davide Radi, Noemi Schmitt, Iryna Sushko, Frank Westerhoff
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves (i) no hyperbolic cycles of period n≥2 can exist and any such cycle must satisfy Pσ(1)=0 (Property 5), (ii) when Pσ(1)=0 and det Jσ≠1, there exist maximal admissible n-cycles of (bounded or one-sided) segments filled with nonhyperbolic σ-cycles (Property 6), and (iii) consequently there are no chaotic attractors under the adopted definition; generically, bounded attractors are either the fixed point O or a WQA. These statements and their proof strategy match the model’s Phase 2 solution almost verbatim, using the same linear homogeneity argument for Fσ and the same segment construction, plus the same chaos definition requiring density of periodic orbits. See Property 5 and 6 and the discussion on chaos and genericity in the paper .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript develops a coherent, correct account of WQAs for a prototypical homogeneous discontinuous PWL map, proving the absence of hyperbolic periodic orbits and, under a standard topological definition, the absence of chaotic attractors. The mechanism via cyclic segments is well presented, and parameter-space structure is elucidated with informative figures. Minor revisions would strengthen formal precision (e.g., admissibility) and make assumptions explicit.