Back to search
2503.11264

On the emergence and properties of weird quasiperiodic attractors

Laura Gardini, Davide Radi, Noemi Schmitt, Iryna Sushko, Frank Westerhoff

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves (i) no hyperbolic cycles of period n≥2 can exist and any such cycle must satisfy Pσ(1)=0 (Property 5), (ii) when Pσ(1)=0 and det Jσ≠1, there exist maximal admissible n-cycles of (bounded or one-sided) segments filled with nonhyperbolic σ-cycles (Property 6), and (iii) consequently there are no chaotic attractors under the adopted definition; generically, bounded attractors are either the fixed point O or a WQA. These statements and their proof strategy match the model’s Phase 2 solution almost verbatim, using the same linear homogeneity argument for Fσ and the same segment construction, plus the same chaos definition requiring density of periodic orbits. See Property 5 and 6 and the discussion on chaos and genericity in the paper .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops a coherent, correct account of WQAs for a prototypical homogeneous discontinuous PWL map, proving the absence of hyperbolic periodic orbits and, under a standard topological definition, the absence of chaotic attractors. The mechanism via cyclic segments is well presented, and parameter-space structure is elucidated with informative figures. Minor revisions would strengthen formal precision (e.g., admissibility) and make assumptions explicit.