2503.19518
Fronts in Dissipative Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou Chains
Michael Herrmann, Guillaume James, Karsten Matthies
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves existence, uniqueness (with phase), monotonicity, and sharp exponential tails for the nonlocal front equation via an implicit function theorem in weighted Sobolev spaces and a careful Fourier-symbol analysis; see Theorem 1 and Sections 4–5, including the O(ε) estimate in H1 and the tail analysis through the modified kernels a±ε and their poles . The candidate solution correctly matches several ingredients (limit ODE, small-ε continuation, O(ε) estimate, symmetry), but its monotonicity and tail arguments hinge on an unstated “maximum principle/barrier” for the operator Λε∗ρ′ + ρ − Φ′′(0)Λε∗ρ, which is not positivity-preserving due to the odd kernel entering via Λε∗ρ′. The paper avoids this pitfall by re-casting the problem for Sε = −Rε′ and exploiting resolvent kernels a±ε; it then proves positivity and precise rates without invoking a maximum principle . Because the model’s monotonicity step relies on an invalid comparison principle for the nonlocal operator, its proof is incomplete at a crucial point, and thus incorrect as written.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} reject \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper under audit is rigorous and complete: it proves existence via an implicit function theorem in weighted spaces and addresses monotonicity and sharp decay through a resolvent-kernel/symbol analysis that circumvents the lack of a comparison principle. The candidate solution, while capturing the main local and perturbative structure, relies on an unstated maximum-principle/barrier argument for a nonlocal operator with an odd-kernel derivative term; this comparison step is not valid as presented. Consequently the candidate’s monotonicity and tail-control claims are unsupported, whereas the paper’s approach is sound.