2504.02126
Fractal Patterns in Discrete Laplacians: Iterative Construction on 2D Square Lattices
Małgorzata Nowak-Kȩpczyk
wrongmedium confidenceCounterexample detected
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper states a universal Proposition that for every binary-style figure, for arbitrary seeds and neighborhoods, the pattern at i = 8k is a spread of its seeds and at least 13-steps away from connectedness, with a proof sketch deferred to the Appendix. The formal sketch, however, is only carried out for the Diag–Neumann neighborhood and seeds inside a 3×3 square, not for arbitrary neighborhoods; the text then generalizes based on observation rather than proof. Moreover, the universal claim is false: in the translation-invariant one-sided neighborhood M = {(1,0)}, the linear operator L = I + T obeys L^8 = I + T^8 in characteristic 2, so F8 = S ⊕ (S − 8e1). Choosing S1 = {(0,0),(8,0)} shows F8 is not a disjoint union of translates of S1, contradicting the ‘spread of seeds’ claim; choosing S2 = {(0,0),(1,0)} yields two components only 7 steps apart, contradicting the claimed ≥13-step bound. The paper’s proof sketch and assertions do not address these counterexamples. See Proposition and its scope claim in the main text and the Appendix’s neighborhood/seed restrictions in the proof sketch.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} reject \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The main Proposition is stated for arbitrary seeds and neighborhoods but is only supported by a sketch under a specific diagonal neighborhood with small seeds, then broadened heuristically by observation. This generalization is incorrect: straightforward translation-invariant asymmetric neighborhoods produce counterexamples that violate both the claimed ‘spread of seeds’ structure and the universal ≥13-step connectedness bound. The manuscript would need to narrow its claims to provable settings or supply a rigorous proof for the full scope.