2504.06377
Geometric perspective of linear stability in finite networks of nonlinear oscillators
Yashee Sinha, Priya B. Jain, Antonio Mihara, Rene O. Medrano-T, Ján Mináč, Lyle E. Muller, Roberto C. Budzinski
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
Both the paper and the candidate solution correctly derive the finite‑N linear stability test for q‑twisted states on circulant networks, namely λ_{m,q} = (γ_{q+m}+γ_{q−m})/2 − γ_q (paper: Eq. (2)/(5) and Appendix Eq. (23) ). However, for the selection claim (“which q has the largest basin”), the paper only provides a heuristic/empirical argument referencing prior work on basins and stable eigenvalues (no self‑contained proof here) , while the model’s attempt to prove that the argmax of γ_q maximizes a certified local basin margin relies on an unsupported inequality. Thus, linear stability is handled correctly; basin selection is not rigorously established by either, leaving both incomplete.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript's finite-N stability analysis is sound and useful, unifying connectivity and lags/delays via a circulant operator K. However, the selection claim (largest real-part eigenvalue of K corresponds to the largest basin) is not proved in a self-contained way and currently relies on prior work and numerics. To reach publishable rigor, this part needs a theorem with hypotheses and proof or a careful reframing as a conjecture accompanied by systematic numerical evidence and clarified assumptions.