2504.07038
STRUCTURED EXTENSIONS AND MULTI-CORRELATION SEQUENCES
James Leng
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The uploaded paper proves the strong decomposition: every k-fold multi-correlation sequence c(n) is a sum of a degree-k generalized nilsequence and a null-sequence (Theorem 1.6; see the abstract and main theorem statements) . By contrast, the model’s argument relies on a misstatement of Frantzikinakis (2015): that work provides only a weak, ε-dependent approximation by a nilsequence plus an error whose L2-density can be made ≤ ε (not a single, fixed null-sequence) . The model then incorrectly promotes this to a single decomposition c(n)=b(n)+a(n) with a(n) null by assuming an ε-independent “uniform-density-small” error; this step is not justified by [13] as summarized in the paper. While the model’s smooth/continuous nilsequence equivalence is correct (remark in the paper) , the crucial decomposition claim is unsupported. Hence the paper is correct and the model’s proof is flawed.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript resolves a central open problem by proving a strong decomposition for multi-correlation sequences. Its combination of ergodic and finitary inverse theorems is technically sophisticated and conceptually novel. While the exposition is dense, the argument is coherent and well-structured. Minor revisions to improve readability and highlight the weak/strong distinction would increase accessibility.