Back to search
2504.10373

DUE: A Deep Learning Framework and Library for Modeling Unknown Equations

Junfeng Chen, Kailiang Wu, Dongbin Xiu

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines OSG-Net as Fθ(u,Δ)=u+ΔNθ(u,Δ), which immediately implies Fθ(u,0)=u, i.e., Φ0=In, matching part (1) of the solver’s argument . The semigroup property ΦΔ1+Δ2=ΦΔ1∘ΦΔ2 is stated as the target structure (2.14b), and the paper enforces it via the GDSG semigroup-informed loss (3.3)–(3.4) that compares one-step (Δ0+Δ1) vs. two-step rollouts; if this residual vanishes for all u and positive Δ, the solver’s derivation correctly shows the semigroup law for all Δ≥0, consistent with the paper’s intent . For (3), the multi-step loss averages errors over K+1 future steps (3.2), directly penalizing rollout discrepancies and mitigating accumulation, aligning with the solver’s explanation . Minor note: the solver assumed both composition equalities (A) and (B); only one is needed to conclude the semigroup identity (order is a convention), but this redundancy does not affect correctness.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The audited components (OSG-Net identity at zero step, target semigroup property, semigroup-informed loss, and multi-step loss) are correct and coherent. The solver’s derivations are sound and align with the paper’s design. Minor clarifications (e.g., that one composition ordering suffices and that the semigroup property is promoted in practice via a residual) would further sharpen the exposition without impacting the conclusions.