2504.12448
Sublinearly Morseness in Higher Rank Symmetric Spaces
Rou Wen
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that, under ϕ-divergence and finiteness of the Bowen–Margulis–Sullivan (BMS) measure on Γ0\SΩ, one has μ(∂SM,θ(Γ))=1, by constructing Pθ-sublinearly Morse sequences via ergodicity of the geodesic flow, a positive-time-in-compact-part argument (Birkhoff), and explicit estimates (Propositions 6.6 and 6.9) culminating in Theorem 6.3; see the definition of the BMS measure and Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy, and the proof of the main theorem in Section 6 (ergodicity via Theorem 3.3, then (6.9), then Theorem 6.3), and the precise content of Theorem 3.1 giving the projective model and boundary homeomorphism . By contrast, the candidate solution incorrectly bases the construction on Poincaré recurrence to a measurable “fundamental domain” and assumes compactness to get a finite increment set E_F; finiteness of m̄ does not produce a compact fundamental domain on SΩ, and this step is unjustified. It also attributes the sublinear quasigeodesic tracking and θ-regular drift to Theorem 3.1, which does not provide those properties—these are instead established later in the paper via Section 6 (Propositions 6.6, 6.9, and Theorem 6.3) . Therefore, the paper’s argument is correct, while the model’s proof has critical gaps.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes a clear and natural genericity statement: Patterson–Sullivan measure gives full mass to the sublinearly Morse boundary under standard divergence and finiteness assumptions. The proof is well-structured: it leverages the recent Canary–Zhang–Zimmer framework (Theorem 3.1), constructs the BMS measure, invokes the Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy for ergodicity, and uses Birkhoff to derive positive density of time in compact parts. The geometric construction of sublinearly Morse sequences (Section 6) is carefully executed. The extension to relatively Anosov groups (Section 7) via cusp decomposition and a shadow-lemma type estimate is convincing. Minor revisions could further clarify the positivity of m̄(Γ0/W) and streamline cross-referencing of results.