Back to search
2504.14263

A uniform Tits alternative for endomorphisms of the projective line

Alonso Beaumont

correcthigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves precisely the j = 1 statement: if f1 and f2 are polarized by the same ample line bundle and PrePer(f1) ≠ PrePer(f2), then f1 and f2 themselves generate a free semigroup of rank 2. This is Theorem 1.1, proved via a refined ping–pong argument on the complete metric space of heights HL using a new ping–pong lemma for injective contractions (Proposition 2.1) and the canonical-height fixed points of αf (the pullback contraction) . The candidate solution claims the j = 1 case is likely open and only obtains freeness after passing to powers, contradicting the paper’s main theorem and proof .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The note cleanly resolves a natural strengthening of prior results by establishing freeness for the original generators (j = 1) using a sharp contraction-based ping–pong on the height space. The argument is short, correct, and conceptually illuminating. Minor clarifications would make the exposition fully self-contained for a broad arithmetic dynamics readership.