Back to search
2504.20386

Safe and Optimal N-Spacecraft Swarm Reconfiguration in Non-Keplerian Cislunar Orbits

Yuji Takubo, Walter Manuel, Ethan Foss, Simone D’Amico

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines the first‑order QPRIT/QPRO condition in LTC (h = dot α = dot β = dot h = 0, equivalently h = dot ε = dot θ = dot h = 0), and proposes constraints (21a)–(21b) to enforce proximity to that invariant surface while keeping ε above the terminal radius ε_f, asserting this suffices for passive safety. The candidate solution follows the same logic, adds routine bounds on dot ε and dot θ from dot α, dot β using ε = sqrt(α^2+β^2), and reaches the same safety conclusion. Minor caveats (e.g., dependence on KOZ geometry and the non-orthonormal LTC frame) are shared and do not overturn the core argument.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

A sound and practically useful contribution: the LTC framing with QPRIT-based per-step safety constraints is elegant and supported by case studies across CR3BP/ER3BP/BCR4BP. The core first-order argument is correct, but the paper would benefit from a short formal statement and proof sketch linking the coordinate radius ε to geometric separation and KOZ avoidance, plus a brief discussion of robustness when tolerances are nonzero and the LTC basis is not orthonormal.