2504.20386
Safe and Optimal N-Spacecraft Swarm Reconfiguration in Non-Keplerian Cislunar Orbits
Yuji Takubo, Walter Manuel, Ethan Foss, Simone D’Amico
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines the first‑order QPRIT/QPRO condition in LTC (h = dot α = dot β = dot h = 0, equivalently h = dot ε = dot θ = dot h = 0), and proposes constraints (21a)–(21b) to enforce proximity to that invariant surface while keeping ε above the terminal radius ε_f, asserting this suffices for passive safety. The candidate solution follows the same logic, adds routine bounds on dot ε and dot θ from dot α, dot β using ε = sqrt(α^2+β^2), and reaches the same safety conclusion. Minor caveats (e.g., dependence on KOZ geometry and the non-orthonormal LTC frame) are shared and do not overturn the core argument.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} A sound and practically useful contribution: the LTC framing with QPRIT-based per-step safety constraints is elegant and supported by case studies across CR3BP/ER3BP/BCR4BP. The core first-order argument is correct, but the paper would benefit from a short formal statement and proof sketch linking the coordinate radius ε to geometric separation and KOZ avoidance, plus a brief discussion of robustness when tolerances are nonzero and the LTC basis is not orthonormal.