Back to search
2505.07738

Counting and equidistribution of strongly reversible closed geodesics in negative curvature

Jouni Parkkonen, Frédéric Paulin

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that the number of {I,J}-reversible closed geodesics grows like (||σ_I^+||·||σ_J^-||)/(δ_Γ||m_BM||)·exp(δ_Γ T/2), and that for I=J the Lebesgue measures along these orbits equidistribute to m_BM, by reducing to counting/equidistribution of common perpendiculars between fixed-point sets of involutions and carefully handling multiplicities (Theorem 1.1; proof overview and hypotheses) . The key geometric input is that for involutions α,β with disjoint fixed sets, γ=βα is loxodromic with axis generated by the common perpendicular and length λ(γ)=2·d(F_α,F_β) (Lemma 2.3) . The multiset bijections between Γ-orbits of pairs (α,β), common perpendiculars, and reversible conjugacy classes, as well as the multiplicity formula, are explicit (Proposition 3.3 and Eq. (10)) . The counting step is obtained from general theorems on common perpendiculars (Theorem 5.1 specialized to P=0) , and equidistribution follows by decomposing each reversible orbit into two common-perpendicular segments and invoking equidistribution of these segments (Theorem 6.2; identity (29)) . The candidate solution follows the same reduction, uses the same length-halving relation, the same multiplicities, and the same skinning-measure machinery; differences are only presentational. Hence both are correct and essentially the same proof.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

A technically solid and conceptually clean extension of reversible-geodesic counting/equidistribution from surfaces to general negatively curved orbifolds and trees. The reduction to common perpendiculars with a careful multiplicity apparatus is powerful, and the use of skinning measures yields sharp constants and error terms in natural settings. Exposition is generally clear; a few assumptions could be spotlighted earlier and some auxiliary facts recalled for completeness.