2505.08873
Cholera Transmission Dynamics with Sanitation Control Measures
Abdallah Alsammani, Gassan A.M.O. Farah, Mohammed A.Y. Mohammed, Mehmet Yavuz
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s model, equilibrium, and threshold statements exactly match the candidate’s results: the DFE is (Λ/(µ+ν), 0, νΛ/(µ(µ+ν)), 0) as derived in the paper’s Equilibria section, and the paper’s formula for R0 coincides term-by-term with the candidate’s next-generation calculation, including the Monod derivative contribution at W=0 and the θ/σ linkage through the environment. Local stability is asserted to follow the classic threshold: DFE stable if R0<1 and unstable if R0>1. The paper arrives at R0 via linearization and ratio-of-inflow/ removal reasoning and mentions the Jacobian-based stability criterion; the candidate provides a fully explicit next-generation matrix (F,V), block Jacobian, and determinant/trace test. Hence, both are correct; the proofs differ in presentation detail and formalism. Model equations and interventions are consistent with the paper’s system (1) and assumptions, including β2(W)=βmax W/(k+W) and controls ϵh, ϵw, ν. See the model formulation and assumptions , the DFE derivation , the explicit R0 expression and DFE Jacobian discussion , and the stated R0-threshold stability conclusion .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The analytical content is correct and consistent with standard SIWR cholera modeling. The paper identifies the DFE and derives an R0 that matches a standard next-generation derivation, and its local stability claims follow the classic threshold. The main opportunity is to make the analysis more explicit (write F and V, show determinant/trace relations) and to justify the bifurcation claim rigorously or cite an appropriate theorem. These are presentation-level refinements rather than substantive corrections.