Back to search
2505.09954

STABILITY, BIFURCATION, AND CHAOS CONTROL IN A DISCRETE-TIME PHYTOPLANKTON-ZOOPLANKTON MODEL WITH HOLLING TYPE II AND TYPE III FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES

Sobirjon Shoyimardonov

wrongmedium confidenceCounterexample detected
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s existence proof for a Neimark–Sacker (NS) bifurcation uses a “frozen-equilibrium” Jacobian and concludes the transversality derivative d|λ|/dγ is strictly positive, hence fixing the direction (γ>γ0 if L<0). That derivative is not taken along the branch of positive equilibria E(γ) and can have either sign (in particular, it can be negative for h=2). The candidate solution correctly differentiates det J along E(γ), obtains an explicit formula, proves Δ>0 for h=1, and shows Δ may change sign for h=2, which reverses the direction. Aside from this sign error and missing hypotheses (e.g., L≠0), the paper’s setup, Jacobian, characteristic polynomial, and Lyapunov-coefficient formula match standard theory.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The analysis is largely sound and well presented, but the transversality is checked at a frozen base point rather than along the equilibrium branch. This leads to an unconditional direction claim for the NS bifurcation that is not generally valid (it can reverse for h=2). Correcting this and explicitly stating the required nondegeneracy hypothesis L≠0 are necessary for publication.