2505.09954
STABILITY, BIFURCATION, AND CHAOS CONTROL IN A DISCRETE-TIME PHYTOPLANKTON-ZOOPLANKTON MODEL WITH HOLLING TYPE II AND TYPE III FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES
Sobirjon Shoyimardonov
wrongmedium confidenceCounterexample detected
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s existence proof for a Neimark–Sacker (NS) bifurcation uses a “frozen-equilibrium” Jacobian and concludes the transversality derivative d|λ|/dγ is strictly positive, hence fixing the direction (γ>γ0 if L<0). That derivative is not taken along the branch of positive equilibria E(γ) and can have either sign (in particular, it can be negative for h=2). The candidate solution correctly differentiates det J along E(γ), obtains an explicit formula, proves Δ>0 for h=1, and shows Δ may change sign for h=2, which reverses the direction. Aside from this sign error and missing hypotheses (e.g., L≠0), the paper’s setup, Jacobian, characteristic polynomial, and Lyapunov-coefficient formula match standard theory.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The analysis is largely sound and well presented, but the transversality is checked at a frozen base point rather than along the equilibrium branch. This leads to an unconditional direction claim for the NS bifurcation that is not generally valid (it can reverse for h=2). Correcting this and explicitly stating the required nondegeneracy hypothesis L≠0 are necessary for publication.