Back to search
2505.13689

Piecewise linear circle maps and conjugation to rigid rational rotations

Paul Glendinning, Siyuan Ma, James Montaldi

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 2.2 states and proves that a PWL orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism with rational rotation number p/q is conjugate by a PWL map to the rigid rotation r_{p/q} if and only if every break point is periodic; the proof shows that periodic break points force f^q ≡ Id on the circle, and then a PWL conjugacy is constructed (via Lemma 3.1) . The candidate solution proves the same equivalence, using the same core idea—on each component between break-orbit points, f^q is affine and fixes endpoints, hence is the identity there, giving f^q ≡ Id—then builds a conjugacy by solving a piecewise-linear cohomological equation. One minor flaw is the model’s internal justification that every periodic point must have minimal period exactly q; the provided argument is incorrect, though the fact itself is standard for circle homeomorphisms and is explicitly invoked in the paper’s proof (“they must all have the same period, q”) . With that correction, the two proofs are essentially the same in structure, differing mainly in how the conjugacy is constructed after f^q ≡ Id.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The main equivalence is natural and sharp for PWL circle homeomorphisms with rational rotation number. The proof is clean: periodic break points force f\^q to be the identity, and a constructive lemma yields a PWL conjugacy to the rigid rotation. The result situates well alongside classical irrational cases and connects to mode-locking phenomena. A few technical steps (uniform integer shift on lifts; explicit period-q fact) could be spelled out more explicitly, but the arguments are sound and readable.