2506.16660
The simplest chaos indicator derived from Lagrangian descriptors
Javier Jiménez-López, V. J. García-Garrido
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper gives only a heuristic derivation of the ∆L bounds for the arclength LD—expanding fi(x′) to first order, linearizing the square root, and substituting |δx_i(t)| ≈ |β| e^{λ_i(t−t0)}—without controlling remainders or addressing degeneracies (e.g., division by ∥f∥ near slow points), and it contains an algebraic slip in the p-norm appendix where a factor p is missing in the denominator of the final bound (its Eq. (35)) . The model’s main arclength proof is substantially sound—deriving a finite-window bound from a Lipschitz estimate for F(x)=∥f(x)∥ and the variational flow—yet its optional Hölder-style estimate for the p-norm uses an incorrect inequality for 0<p≤1. Hence, both treatments are incomplete: the paper’s argument is heuristic and overlooks edge cases, and the model’s optional p-norm addendum has a technical flaw.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The ∆L indicator is simple and computationally attractive, and experiments are persuasive. The theory section, however, relies on first-order heuristics and a coordinate-wise growth ansatz without controlling error terms or clarifying assumptions (e.g., behavior near points where ∥f∥ is small). The appendix’s missing factor p in the integrated p-norm bound should be corrected. Addressing these points will make the claims precise and robust.