2506.18352
Brown–Voiculescu entropy revisited
Bhishan Jacelon, Robert Neagu
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Theorem 5.4 rigorously: for simple, separable, unital, nuclear, Z-stable C*-algebras with finitely many extremal traces and UCT, not AF, one has htdr(α) = sup_{τ∈∂eT(A)} hqd_τ(α) = sup_{τ∈T(A)} hqd_τ(α). The proof first shows htdr ≥ hqd_τ for every trace (Proposition 5.3), then constructs 2-colour, contractive decomposable approximations from quasidiagonal systems of the finitely many extremal traces, yielding htdr ≤ max_i hqd_{τ_i} and hence the equality (Theorem 5.4, with the key steps (5.1)–(5.7)) . By contrast, the model solution conflates nuclear dimension with decomposition rank in step (i), incorrectly claiming CETWW’s dim_nuc(A)=1 gives contractive two-colour (decomposition rank) approximations; contractivity is part of decomposition rank, not nuclear dimension. It also incorrectly asserts that in the AF case both sides are zero, contradicting the paper’s AF computations where htdr equals Voiculescu’s approximation entropy and can be positive (e.g., log k for a UHF Bernoulli shift) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The variational-type principle relating contractive coloured entropy to quasidiagonal entropies of extremal traces is clean and well motivated. The proof leverages modern classification and Z-stability with careful rank bookkeeping to avoid pitfalls (e.g., reindexing that alters finite-dimensional sizes). The exposition is clear, with helpful remarks explaining the necessity of the finiteness of the tracial boundary and how to avoid the “not AF” hypothesis via a modified definition. Minor clarifications would further aid readers in tracking the role of decomposition rank versus nuclear dimension.