2506.18752
Versatile Absorption Modeling for Transmissive Optical Elements Using Ray Tracing and Finite Element Analysis
Mark Kurcsics, Peter Eberhard
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines the absorption model and three point-to-node mapping schemes precisely, including q_front^surf = α_S Pray,inc, the Beer–Lambert segment recursion Prayi = Prayi−1 − qvoli−1, qvoli = Prayi(1 − e^{−αV lseg}), and the back-surface term q_back^surf = α_S (Pray_nseg − q_vol_nseg), as well as mapping formulas f_e = N^T(ξ_vol) q_vol (shape functions) and normalized inverse-distance weightings; it explicitly notes conservation for the global inverse-distance method and the formulas themselves ensure it for the other two . The candidate solution supplies the missing closed-form solution of the recursion, proves independence of Σ_i q_vol,i from n_seg, and writes down the full energy budget including the transmitted power P_out, which the paper does not explicitly derive but is fully consistent with its model. Hence both are correct; the model provides an explicit proof where the paper presents the algorithmic formulation.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a coherent, flexible coupling of ray tracing to thermal FE with three mapping schemes and practical guidance on accuracy vs. cost. The core formulations are consistent and physically grounded. A brief, explicit derivation of the discrete-to-continuous Beer–Lambert equivalence and the final transmitted power would modestly improve rigor and readability.