Back to search
2506.22211

Pattern formation in a Swift–Hohenberg equation with spatially periodic coefficients

Jolien Kamphuis, Martina Chirilus-Bruckner

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves an O(ε^2)–accurate Ginzburg–Landau (GL) approximation on times t ∈ [0, T0/ε^2] for the periodically forced Swift–Hohenberg equation using a Bloch-based ansatz with an O(ε^2) corrector and shows a residual of order O(ε^4); the amplitude equation coefficients are r, ½∂^2_ℓλ1(ℓ0), and −3∫|ψ1(ℓ0,x)|^4ρ(x)dx (Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 3.4). These match the candidate solution’s derivation and estimates, including the non-resonance condition 3ℓ0 ≠ ℓ0 (mod kf) and use of uniformly local Sobolev spaces Y = H^ϑ_ul for the error estimate; see the paper’s statement of Theorem 1.1 and its setup via the Bloch transform and function spaces. The overlap in method and results is substantive and detailed, not merely thematic. Key points are explicitly present in the paper: the PDE and periodic setting, the spectral assumptions (including gap and non-resonance), the Bloch formulation and ansatz, the residual bound, and the final H^ϑ_ul error estimate.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript rigorously justifies a Ginzburg–Landau modulation equation for a Swift–Hohenberg equation with order-one periodic forcing, using a Bloch-based ansatz and uniformly local energy estimates. The argument is technically sound and well-situated in the literature, and the result is relevant for heterogeneous media. Some clarifications (explicit eigenpair regularity in ℓ, a concise semigroup bound statement) would further strengthen readability and reproducibility, but the core contributions appear correct and valuable.