2507.04780
Retrodicting Chaotic Systems: An Algorithmic Information Theory Approach
Kamal Dingle, Boumediene Hamzi, Marcus Hutter, Houman Owhadi
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper explicitly argues that among the m=|g^{-1}(y)| candidates, the number whose Kolmogorov complexity is below that of the true start x0 is bounded by about 2^{K(x0)} (their Eq. (15)), so the fraction 2^{K(x0)}/m → 0 as m→∞ (their Eq. (16)). This is exactly the standard prefix-free counting bound the model uses via Kraft’s inequality, instantiated with k=K(x0), and the same asymptotic conclusion follows. The paper also gives a complementary heuristic showing typical candidates have K(xi) ≳ K(m) (Eqs. (10)–(14)), which the model does not need for the vanishing-fraction claim. Hence both are correct and essentially the same proof for the core result about a vanishing fraction of candidates being simpler than x0 . The problem setup and goals—retrodict x0 from y=f^n(x0) and improve over uniform guessing—match as well .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper defines a crisp retrodiction task and uses well-established AIT tools to derive a meaningful asymptotic guarantee: for finite-complexity starts, the true preimage lies in a vanishingly small low-complexity subset. This core result is correct and valuable conceptually. The empirical section is exploratory but illustrative. Minor clarifications about assumptions, encoding, and explicit citation of standard bounds would further strengthen the exposition without altering conclusions.