Back to search
2507.05164

A Dynamical Systems Perspective on the Analysis of Neural Networks

Dennis Chemnitz, Maximilian Engel, Christian Kuehn, Sara-Viola Kuntz

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper states that augmented neural ODEs with m ≥ d + q have the universal embedding property with respect to C^k(R^d, R^q) (Theorem 2.6), under a non-parameterized vector field f ∈ C^{0,k} and full-rank affine lift/readout layers, exactly as defined in its architecture section. This directly matches the candidate’s explicit construction: embed x as (x,0,0), run the triangular shear flow (u,v,r) -> (u, v + Ψ(u), r) generated by f(t,(u,v,r)) = (0, Ψ(u), 0), and read out v, yielding Φθ(x) = Ψ(x). The paper’s result is cited as established in [86], while the candidate gives a concrete shear-flow proof; these are substantially the same idea. Minor formal nuances (k ≥ 0 vs the earlier definition for k ≥ 1) do not affect correctness here, since the special triangular field guarantees global existence and uniqueness even for k=0. Key assumptions (augmentation m ≥ d + q; full-rank lift/readout; f ∈ C^{0,k}) are satisfied in both. Citations: the architecture and lift/readout setup (equations (9)–(10) and non-parameterized f) appear in the paper’s Section 2.2–2.3, and Theorem 2.6 is stated in Section 2.3–2.4.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The universal embedding theorem for augmented neural ODEs is correctly stated under a non-parameterized vector field framework and aligns with standard constructions. The paper clearly defines the architecture and cites prior work appropriately. Including an explicit constructive proof (triangular shear) would make the presentation self-contained and remove any ambiguity regarding regularity thresholds (k ≥ 0 vs k ≥ 1).