2507.11958
Interacting Hosts with Microbiome Exchange: An Extension of Metacommunity Theory for Discrete Interactions
Michael Johnson, Mason A. Porter
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves the HFLSA: as λ_tot→∞ with α:=λ_totγ fixed and g(i) C^1 and bounded, the stochastic process N(i)(t) stays within δ of the ODE solution Ñ(i)(t) on [0,T] with probability ≥1−ε, see Theorem 4.1 and Appendix B . Their proof uses a small-time discretization, Poisson counting with per-interval Chebyshev bounds, and an error recursion culminating in a uniform-in-time bound (e.g., (B.53) and the final (B.60)–(B.63)) . The candidate solution proves the same limit via a semimartingale decomposition with compensated Poisson martingales and Doob’s L^2 maximal inequality, yielding an explicit rate O_P(λ_tot^{-1/2}) under the same boundedness/C^1 assumptions (boundedness is exactly the paper’s forward-invariant [0,M]^n hypothesis) . Thus both are correct; the approaches differ (paper: elementary discretization/Chebyshev; model: martingale/Doob).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The work formulates a flexible stochastic framework for host–microbiome exchange and gives rigorous approximations in clear parameter regimes. The HFLSA and HFCSA results are substantively correct and well-motivated, with careful proofs and informative simulations. Minor revisions could streamline the HFLSA proof by leveraging standard martingale tools, improve notational consistency, and make the dependence of constants more transparent.