Back to search
2507.13559

Oscillatory Behavior of Linear Nonautonomous Advanced and Delayed Impulsive Differential Equations with Discontinuous Deviating Arguments via Difference Equations

Ricardo Torres Naranjo, Eugenio Trucco Vera, Özkan Öcal

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives the discrete evolution z(n+1) = a_n z(n) + b_n z(n−k) on each unit interval via variation of constants (equations (5.5)–(5.6)) and the impulse at n+1 , then normalizes to obtain the reduced difference equation Δy_n + Q_n y_{n−k} = 0 with Q_n exactly as in (7.5) . Under k ∈ N and Q_n > 0, the paper invokes Erbe–Zhang-type discrete oscillation criteria, here written equivalently as (A) lim sup(…)< −k^k/(k+1)^{k+1} or (B) lim inf ∑(…)< −1 (Lemma 11) , and earlier establishes that oscillation of the discrete samples implies oscillation of the full IDEPCA solution (Lemma 2) . The candidate solution follows the same pipeline—(i) intervalwise variation of constants, (ii) the same normalization producing the identical Q_n, (iii) application of the Erbe–Zhang criteria in the equivalent Q_n form, and (iv) a bridge back to z(t) (via an IVT-based continuity argument that is equivalent in effect to Lemma 2).

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript cleanly reduces IDEPCA to a delay difference equation and imports sharp oscillation criteria from the discrete literature. The logic is sound and the translation is correct. Minor editorial refinements (chiefly, making the discrete-to-continuous bridge explicit where IDEPCA criteria are stated) would further improve clarity.