2507.18765
Adding a fecundity-survival trade-off to a discrete population model with maturation delay
Christopher J. Greyson-Gaito, Sabrina H. Streipert, Gail S.K. Wolkowicz
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:57 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
For the BH-Constant model Nt+1 = Nt/(1+α+βNt) + m(τ)Nt−τ with 0<m(τ)<1, the paper proves the global dichotomy: (i) if (1+α)m(τ) < α then 0 is the only nonnegative equilibrium and is globally asymptotically stable; (ii) if (1+α)m(τ) > α then a unique positive equilibrium N* = ((1+α)m(τ) − α)/(β(1−m(τ))) exists and is globally asymptotically stable (see the model specification (18), the equilibrium formula (19), and Theorems 3.11 and 3.13) . The candidate solution derives exactly the same threshold and equilibrium and gives a direct min–max block argument. Its key min/max inequalities are stated too strongly in full generality but are used only in the regimes where they do hold, so its conclusions match the paper’s.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper’s BH-Constant results are correct and well-situated within a broader, biologically motivated framework that includes trade-offs and other survival forms. The candidate independently attains the same conclusions via a different route. Minor technical clarifications (chiefly conditioning the block inequalities) would make the alternative proof fully rigorous.