2507.18843
Order of dynamical and control systems on maximal compact subgroups
Mauro Patrão, Laércio dos Santos
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:57 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper rigorously proves an extended Bruhat order on the Weyl–Tits group U (Theorem 1.1), its coset version for a hyperbolic H (Theorem 3.12), and a partial algebraic characterization of the order of control sets (Theorem 4.8). The model’s solution reaches the same statements but contains a key mistake in part (a): it asserts S(u) = π^{-1}(cl(B(π(u)))), which is false because π^{-1}(cl(B(w))) is a union of Schubert closures S(v) over all fiber choices, not a single S(u). The model also omits necessary structural assumptions (e.g., finite center, existence of a complexification to ensure C is abelian) used in the paper. Hence, while the conclusions match, the model’s proof is not correct.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript presents a clear and useful extension of Bruhat-type order to the Weyl–Tits group U that coherently unifies dynamical orders of minimal Morse components and control sets on maximal compact subgroups. The results (Theorems 1.1, 3.12, 4.8) appear correct and well-motivated, with proofs that adapt and refine known constructions on flag manifolds. A few expository points (notation harmonization between π and projections, a brief comment on the role of the assumption that C is abelian, and a pointer comparing with Tits’ approach) would improve readability.