2508.05714
High multiplicity and global structure of coexistence states in a predator-prey model with saturation
Kousuke Kuto, Julián López-Gómez, Eduardo Muñoz-Hernández
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:57 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 4.1 is supported by a standard IFT argument for the ε=0 non-degenerate coexistence states and a priori bounds plus global-continuation reasoning (citing [23]) to obtain at least one additional solution, yielding ≥2n+2 solutions for λ∈A_n when ε>0 is small. These steps and the required non-degeneracy set A and its sub-sets A_n are developed rigorously in the text, with the operator G, its linearization, and the eigenvalue structure made explicit. By contrast, the model’s phase-2 proof of the extra solution via the singular rescaling W=εw contains two substantial gaps: (i) the direct-method functional J(W) is not coercive on H^1 without a nonnegativity constraint (and constant supersolutions fail if a(x) vanishes on a set of positive measure), so existence of a positive W_* is not established as written; and (ii) the asserted non-degeneracy of W_* is deduced from an integral identity that does not imply φ≡0. Hence the model’s additional-branch construction is unproven. The IFT-based part matches the paper, but the crucial +1 solution is unsupported in the model’s argument.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a solid and timely contribution: a clean IFT-based derivation of many small-ε coexistence states coupled with a referenced global argument for an extra solution, thus achieving high multiplicity for heterogeneous Holling–Tanner systems. The logic is sound and the presentation is generally clear. Minor clarifications would improve readability, particularly in the final global step.