2508.19139
On Mixing Flows on Finite Area Translation Surfaces
Erick Gordillo
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:57 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper constructs finite-area, infinite-genus translation surfaces by gluing an L-shaped polygon via a mixing staircase transformation T and proves that the vertical flow is (strongly) mixing by verifying Ulcigrai’s mixing criterion through tower partitions and height equidistribution; see Theorem 1.1 and its reduction to suspension flows , the special-flow/surface identification , the mixing criterion and its implementation for the classical staircase (Theorem 4.16) , and its extension to any mixing staircase (Theorem 5.5) . By contrast, the candidate solution models correlations as a convolution against a point process of ‘renewal times’ and invokes a generalized Blackwell renewal theorem for a stationary mixing counting process. The crucial steps—asserting that the induced point process from Birkhoff sums is a stationary mixing renewal(-reward) process and that the renewal theorem applies—are not justified; the inter-arrival times here are a dependent two-valued process generated by a deterministic mixing transformation, not an i.i.d. (or demonstrably suitable) renewal process. The argument also omits the paper’s key structural assumption that spacers lie under the shorter roof level (q), which the paper uses to obtain height equidistribution. Hence, while the paper’s proof is coherent and self-contained, the model’s approach relies on unverified, nontrivial hypotheses and is not currently sound.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper gives explicit examples of mixing vertical flows on finite-area infinite-genus translation surfaces via mixing staircases. The method is robust, the construction is clear, and the proofs align with known tools (Ulcigrai-type criterion, staircase combinatorics). Minor presentational refinements would improve readability and hypothesis clarity, but the mathematical content appears correct and valuable for the field.