2508.19249
Physics-Informed Regression: Parameter Estimation in Parameter-Linear Nonlinear Dynamic Models
Jonas Søeborg Nielsen, Marcus Galea Jacobsen, Albert Brincker Olson, Mads Peter Sørensen, Allan Peter Engsig-Karup
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:57 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper derives the PIR estimator by ordinary least squares for stacked residuals r_I(ω) = A_I ω − b_I, giving ω*_I = (A_I^T A_I)^{-1} A_I^T b_I, and, when partitioning known vs. unknown parameters, ω*_u,I = (A_u^T A_u)^{-1} A_u^T (b_I − A_k ω_k) (their eqs. (7) and (10)). It also presents a ridge-regularized closed form in the appendix. The candidate solution reproduces the same normal-equation derivations with explicit convexity/Hessian arguments and correctly notes rank conditions and an optional pseudoinverse remark. Minor differences are expository (the paper assumes full rank and refers to an appendix proof; the model spells out the gradient/Hessian and highlights that ridge ensures strict convexity even if A is rank-deficient). Overall, the two are consistent and essentially the same proof technique, with the model adding standard clarifications. Citations: equations (6)–(10) and (7) in the paper’s PIR section , single-time OLS formula (5) , and ridge-regularized solution in Appendix 11.3 .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper provides a clean, fast, and useful framing of parameter estimation for parameter-linear dynamical systems via OLS, positioned against PINNs. The derivations are standard but well-integrated into the physics-informed workflow and empirically supported. Minor adjustments would improve precision in stated assumptions and broaden the ridge statement to its full generality.